2023 BIMP-EAGA SPM Dirasmikan           >>           Penandatanganan MoU Penaiktarafan BGEC           >>           Pelancaran Pusat Kecemerlangan Sejarah, Kesultanan Brunei Psb           >>           'I Had To Breastfeed My Husband On Holiday – It Was The Weirdest Thing We've Done'           >>           Librarians Left In Stitches As Overdue Book Finally Returned After 43 Years           >>           Khloe Kardashian Sets The Record Straight On Her Current Relationship Status           >>           Eminem's Daughter Hailie Jade Is Engaged To Evan Mcclintock           >>           See Chris Brown's Shocking Reaction To Losing 2023 Grammy For Best R&B Album           >>           Nissan Warns Costs Must Fall To Make New Electric Cars In UK           >>           Tech Lay-Offs: Dell To Cut Workforce           >>          





[email protected]



[email protected]



[email protected]



+673 222-0178 [Office Hour]

+673 223-6740 [Fax]


Upcoming Events

Prayer Times

The prayer times for Brunei-Muara and Temburong districts. For Tutong add 1 minute and for Belait add 3 minutes.


: 05:07 AM


: 05:17 AM


: 06:36 AM


: 06:59 AM


: 12:35 PM


: 03:56 PM


: 06:32 PM


: 07:44 PM


The Business Directory



Internet & Media

  Home > Internet & Media

UK Spies Violated Privacy Laws With Bulk Data Collection

A tribunal finds that GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 ran afoul of European rights for 17 years.


 October 18th, 2016  |  10:27 AM  |   1121 views



A tribunal finds that GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 ran afoul of European rights for 17 years.


Ever since Edward Snowden's leaks came to light, UK spy agencies have responded to accusations of surveillance overreach with a common boilerplate statement: that their activities are lawful, necessary and proportionate. However, they can't always use that justification any more. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal has ruled that key GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 bulk data collection programs violated privacy protections in the European Convention on Human Rights. Both a Bulk Communications Data effort (which covers data such as visited websites, email metadata and GPS locations) and a Bulk Personal Datasets initiative (covering biographical details like your communications and financial activities) didn't have proper oversight until 2015, when some safeguards came into place. That's particularly damning when BCD was had been in place since 1998, and BPD since 2006.


There weren't sufficient codes of practice covering either program, the Tribunal says. Moreover, there isn't enough evidence to suggest that there was "effective independent oversight." Commissioners had an inherently limited ability to verify how spies collected, stored and destroyed data, and didn't conduct detailed audits. Also, the public didn't know or expect that these surveillance systems were in place -- you can't consent to a program when you don't realize it exists.


The Tribunal is "satisfied" that the newer protections are following European Convention rights. However, the watchdog group Privacy International (which launched litigation to reveal these flaws) isn't happy. It believes that authorization and oversight are still "deeply inadequate," and that the government "barely touched" on its data collection practices even when given a chance. We'd add that the timing of the ruling is ironic, too. The Tribunal is accusing agencies of violating rights just as they're about to get expanded powers under the Investigatory Powers Bill -- while this includes explicit oversight, many are concerned that the UK's privacy intrusions are only going to worsen.



courtesy of ENGADGET

by Jon Fingas


If you have any stories or news that you would like to share with the global online community, please feel free to share it with us by contacting us directly at [email protected]


Related News

Deputy Minister: Moh In Final Phase Of Preparing Health White Paper

 2023-02-07 09:43:27

Second Balloon Over Latin America Is Ours – China

 2023-02-07 11:27:53

Nissan Warns Costs Must Fall To Make New Electric Cars In UK

 2023-02-07 12:10:04